<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/midmarket/daily-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/midmarket/daily-mail/</link>
	<description>All about the United Kingdom’s national, regional and local press</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:33:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stone Roses Leaves the Daily Mail Stone Cold: But Were They Correct? &#171; Anti-Box Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/midmarket/daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-18354</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stone Roses Leaves the Daily Mail Stone Cold: But Were They Correct? &#171; Anti-Box Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/?p=14#comment-18354</guid>
		<description>[...] days; the Daily Mail, devised by brothers Alfred and Harold Harmsworth in 1896, was originally an imperialist political newspaper in line with the Second Boer War. It was then pursued further by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] days; the Daily Mail, devised by brothers Alfred and Harold Harmsworth in 1896, was originally an imperialist political newspaper in line with the Second Boer War. It was then pursued further by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ed speaks! Vanessa Feltz, BBC Radio London &#124; BritishExpat</title>
		<link>http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/midmarket/daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-3029</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ed speaks! Vanessa Feltz, BBC Radio London &#124; BritishExpat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/?p=14#comment-3029</guid>
		<description>[...] of us are fans of the Daily Heil, so this was a good opportunity to refute some of the simplistic nonsense it spouts. (The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of us are fans of the Daily Heil, so this was a good opportunity to refute some of the simplistic nonsense it spouts. (The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Immigration-fixated Daily Mail blind to looming demographic crisis &#124; Left Foot Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/midmarket/daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-3025</link>
		<dc:creator>Immigration-fixated Daily Mail blind to looming demographic crisis &#124; Left Foot Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/?p=14#comment-3025</guid>
		<description>[...] to hit taxpayers and citizens, reflects an immigrant-obsessed worldview that has led the Mail to serious editorial mistakes in the past.    Share  &#124; Permalink  &#124; Leave a comment           Comments &gt;            [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to hit taxpayers and citizens, reflects an immigrant-obsessed worldview that has led the Mail to serious editorial mistakes in the past.    Share  | Permalink  | Leave a comment           Comments &gt;            [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egg Mayo and Bacon in a Bun &#124; Not Delia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/midmarket/daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-1733</link>
		<dc:creator>Egg Mayo and Bacon in a Bun &#124; Not Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/?p=14#comment-1733</guid>
		<description>[...] Daily Mail (I&#8217;m not a fan, by the way, I just happened to come across this in the course of researching [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daily Mail (I&#8217;m not a fan, by the way, I just happened to come across this in the course of researching [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digging up the dirt on Ramsay &#124; Not Delia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/midmarket/daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>Digging up the dirt on Ramsay &#124; Not Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/?p=14#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>[...] the Mail&#8217;s quotation from John Hermse of the Scallop Association defeated me: Gordon Ramsay [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Mail&#8217;s quotation from John Hermse of the Scallop Association defeated me: Gordon Ramsay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can you boil an egg? &#124; Not Delia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/midmarket/daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Can you boil an egg? &#124; Not Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/?p=14#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>[...] not an admirer of the Daily Mail, but a friend sent me a link to this story about boiled eggs now being sold in British [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not an admirer of the Daily Mail, but a friend sent me a link to this story about boiled eggs now being sold in British [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tory Pledge &#171; Futile Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/midmarket/daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tory Pledge &#171; Futile Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishpapers.co.uk/?p=14#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>[...] and 100 people lost their jobs); and the positions that The Daily Mail has taken in the past (their unquestioning support for the British Union of Fascists comes to mind), they&#8217;re not the greatest of sources to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and 100 people lost their jobs); and the positions that The Daily Mail has taken in the past (their unquestioning support for the British Union of Fascists comes to mind), they&#8217;re not the greatest of sources to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

